Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arusuvai Food Processors Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arusuvai Food Processors Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) No Fresh Credit, No 68- No 68 Addition on Old Balances- Audited Brought-Forward Liabilities Cannot Be Taxed Again u/s 68 The Assessee, engaged in trading of pulses & food grains, appealed against additions u/s 68 & penalty u/s 271(1)(c). AY 2015-16 & 2016-17 – Additions u/s 68: AO noticed huge trade payables shown in name of Director, Shri V. Elangovan (₹3.62 Cr & ₹2.37 Cr). Though Elangovan confirmed balances, AO doubted his creditworthiness & treated liabilities as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. CIT(A) uphe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930