This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Taxpayer Wins ₹4.04 Cr Relief: AO Cannot Rely on Non-Response to S.133(6) Notice – Reason: Onus Shifts to Revenue After Primary Proof
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Eskag Sanjeevani Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2019-20
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Eskag Sanjeevani Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)
Unsecured loans not bogus – ITAT Kolkata upholds deletion of ₹ 4.04 Cr u/s 68 & interest addition- Full documentation saves ₹ 4 Cr loan – Repayment through banking channels proves genuineness – Shell-company theory rejected – Burden shifts to AO after assessee’s proof – Reopening based on old statement struck down
Revenue filed appeals against CIT(A)’s order dated 28.05.2024 deleting an addition of ₹ 4,04,50,000 made u/s 68 towards unsecured loans taken from Asha Apartments Pvt Ltd & ₹ 31.27 lak...
Author Info
