Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Bholanath Mishra Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amit Bholanath Mishra Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 50 Not Invocable Without Depreciation: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹57.62 Lakh Addition on Sale of Cars The Mumbai ITAT (A-Bench) allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2016-17, holding that Section 50 cannot be applied in the absence of any depreciation actually allowed on the assets. The assessee had sold two motor cars and claimed set-off of capital losses against long-term capital gains from sale of flats. The AO recomputed depreciation for earlier years, invoked Explanation 6 to Section 43(6), treated the cars as depreciable business assets, a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment to K.Manmohan Shetty.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930