Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : K.P. Enterprises Vs ACIT (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
K.P. Enterprises Vs ACIT (ITAT Agra) Penalty on Estimated Income Deleted – ITAT Agra Rules No Concealment on Presumptive Additions Assessee, a civil contractor, declared income of ₹41.98 lakh. AO rejected books u/s 145(3) &  estimated profit @ 8% of turnover, computing total income at ₹56.90 lakh. Later, after appeal effects & revisions, assessed income stood at ₹47.44 lakh. AO imposed penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of ₹1.68 lakh alleging concealment. CIT(A) upheld the penalty. Before Tribunal, Assessee argued that both AO & CIT(A) had determined income purely on estimation basis...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930