Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manish Punjabhai Odedra Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Manish Punjabhai Odedra Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)

Cash Deposits on Behalf of Clients Not Assessee’s Own Funds – Section 69A Held Inapplicable- ITAT Rajkot Deletes ₹61 Lakh Addition u/s 69A – Assessee Proved to be a Commission Agent, Not Owner of Funds

AO had reopened the case & treated cash deposits in bank as unexplained money, rejecting Assessee’s explanation that the funds belonged to clients for whom he executed derivative transactions as a sub-share broker. Assessee furnished bank statements, ledgers of Angel Broking & Sunf

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC: Hostel/PG Is Residential Dwelling; GST Exemption Restored Indexation From Previous Owner Upheld in Family Settlement & Demerger: ITAT Delhi Notional Turnover ≠ Real Income: ITAT Sends F&O Estimate Back for Fresh Look ITAT Allows Section 54 Deduction despite Registration Delay as Payments Made in Time FIR Reinstated Due to Unresolved Questions Around Gold Revaluation After Loan Repayment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031