Case Law Details
PCIT Vs IFFCO LTD (Delhi High Court)
In view of Section 14A(1), no deduction is to be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the As per Section 2(45) of the Act, ‘total income’ means the total amount of income referred to in Section 5, computed in the manner laid down in the Act. Therefore, Section 14A pertains to disallowance of deduction in respect of income which does not form part of the total income. Since the dividend received by the assessee from OMIFCO, Oman is chargeable to tax in India under the head “Income from other sources” and forms part of the total income, the same is included in taxable income in the computation of income filed by the assessee. However, rebate of tax has been allowed to the assessee from the total taxes in terms of Section 90(2) of the Income Tax Act read with Article 25 of the Indo Oman, DTAA and thus, the dividend earned can be said to be in the nature of excluded income and, therefore, the provisions of Section 14A would not be attracted in this case.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT
1. Present Income Tax Appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 06th January, 2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No.7367/DEL./2017 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2007-08.
2. Learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the expenditure incurred for earning dividend income of Rs.113.86 crores from OMIFCO-OMAN, an overseas company in Oman, cannot be disallowed under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), as no tax is payable on the said dividend in Oman and India, as tax sparing credit of notional tax on the Dividend is allowed under Article 25 of India-Oman DTAA. He states that the ITAT has erred in not appreciating the fact that the assessee is effectively not paying any tax on the said income either in the source country or in India and thus, dividend income for all purposes is exempted from tax. He further states that the ITAT has erred in restricting the disallowance to the tune of Rs.74.26 lakhs as against Rs.9.10 Crore, disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Act after excluding the investment in OMIFCO-Oman.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
