Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s. Pentasoft Technologies Ltd. (Madras High Court at Judicature)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (Appeal) No. 599 of 2010 (2012) 342 ITR 578 (Mad.)
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/07/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CIT vs. M/s. Pentasoft Technologies Ltd. (Madras High Court)- In order to allow a claim under Section 10A of the Act, what all is to be seen is whether such benefit earned by the assessee was derived by virtue of export made by the assessee. The exchange value based on upward or downward of the Rupee value is not in the hands of the assessee. In other words, the assessee does not determine the exchange value of the Indian Rupee. It has to be remembered but for the fact that the assessee is an export house, there was no question of earning any foreign exchange. Therefore, when the fluctuation in foreign exchange rate was solely relatable to the export business of the assessee and the higher Rupee value was earned by virtue of such exports carried out by the assessee, there is no reason why the benefit of Section 10(A) should not be allowed to the assessee.

High Court of Judicature at Madras

Dated : 13.07.2010

Tax Case (Appeal) No. 599 of 2010

(2012) 342 ITR 578 (Mad.)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031