Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Joydeep Mukherjee Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Joydeep Mukherjee Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Penalty U/s 270A – Immunity Application U/s 270AA Cannot Be Rejected Without Hearing – Matter Remanded to AO – ITAT Bangalore Assessee did not file return u/s 139 for AY 2018-19. Based on information regarding salary income, mutual fund investments, interest income, rent and property purchases, the department issued notice u/s 148. In response, assessee filed return declaring income of about ₹4.14 crore, which was accepted in reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144. However, AO initiated penalty u/s 270A for under-reporting of income and levie...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930