Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Joydeep Mukherjee Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Joydeep Mukherjee Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Penalty U/s 270A – Immunity Application U/s 270AA Cannot Be Rejected Without Hearing – Matter Remanded to AO – ITAT Bangalore Assessee did not file return u/s 139 for AY 2018-19. Based on information regarding salary income, mutual fund investments, interest income, rent and property purchases, the department issued notice u/s 148. In response, assessee filed return declaring income of about ₹4.14 crore, which was accepted in reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144. However, AO initiated penalty u/s 270A for under-reporting of income and levie...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930