Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Bharat Agro Industries (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Bharat Agro Industries (ITAT Raipur) Rule 46A Violation Cash Purchase Disallowance Remanded – Interest on Late TDS Held Disallowable – ITAT Raipur The ITAT Raipur partly allowed the Revenue’s appeal and held that the CIT(A) violated Rule 46A by admitting additional evidence relating to certain cash purchases without granting the AO an opportunity of examination. The Tribunal set aside findings regarding purchases of ₹52.96 lakh and ₹22,184 and remanded the matter to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. It further held that the CIT(A) wrongly relied on preponderance of probability t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930