Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahesh Tukaram Matkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mahesh Tukaram Matkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Revised Return After Getting Caught Claiming Wrong Deductions – ITAT Pune Upholds 200% Misreporting Penalty u/s 270A Assessee, an employee of Bosch Ltd., originally filed returns showing income of ₹4.52 lakh for AY 2017-18 after claiming Chapter VI-A deductions of ₹2.35 lakh. The case was reopened u/s 147, during which he filed a revised return admitting total income of ₹8.47 lakh & paid tax of ₹99,262. AO held that the revised return was filed only after detection by the Department & that the earlier claim involved excess deductio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930