Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Bank of Baroda (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Bank of Baroda (ITAT Mumbai) Reopening U/s 147 Quashed – Audit Objection Not Tangible Material After 4 Years – Bad Debt MAT Issue Fails – ITAT Mumbai The Revenue challenged CIT(A)’s order quashing reassessment initiated u/s 147 relating to MAT computation and bad debts written off of ₹907 Cr. The reopening was issued after four years mainly based on a revenue audit objection alleging wrong allowance while computing book profit u/s 115JB. ITAT held that reassessment beyond four years is permissible only if there is failure by the assessee to disclose fully & tr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

CIT(A)’s Non-Speaking Order & Failure to Address Legal Ground- Matter Remanded Section 12AB Registration Cannot Be Denied for Missing Irrevocability Clause Alone: ITAT Follows Bombay HC Reassessment Time-Barred Despite TOLA & Ashish Agarwal: ITAT Upholds Quashing Registration Cannot Be Denied for Technical Defect: ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930