Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sarabjit Singh Bedi Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sarabjit Singh Bedi Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Reassessment Beyond 3 Years Quashed Where Escapement Below ₹50 Lakh – ITAT Delhi The Delhi Bench of the ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings for AY 2017-18, holding that the notice issued under section 148 was without jurisdiction as it violated the mandatory conditions of section 149 of the Income-tax Act. The notice was issued on 31.03.2023, i.e. beyond three assessment years from the end of AY 2017-18. The Tribunal noted that for reopening beyond three years (up to ten years), section 149(1)(b) mandates that the alleged income escaping asses...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930