Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hareshkumar Bhupatbhai Panchani Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hareshkumar Bhupatbhai Panchani Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court)

Gujarat High Court held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act on mere change of opinion is not permissible in law. Accordingly, petition allowed and reassessment notice quashed.

Facts- The petitioner sold an immovable property along with other co-owners for a consideration of Rs.12,35,90,464/-, wherein share of the petitioner was for Rs.02,83,54,388/-. The petitioner having made specific investment, claimed deduction of Rs.01,33,02,123/- u/s. 54F of the Act. Details of

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31