Case Law Details
Case Name : State Bank of India Vs Deepak Kumar Singhania (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
State Bank of India Vs Deepak Kumar Singhania (NCLAT Delhi)
NCLAT Delhi held that issuance of notice under rule 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 doesn’t amount to invoking of guarantee.
Facts- The Corporate Debtor – LML Ltd. was extended Financial Facilities by State Bank of India. The Respondent – Deepak Kumar Singhania executed a Deed of Guarantee dated 28.03.2005 along with other two Personal Guarantors in favour of SBI and a Multi-Partite Agreement date...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

