Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : State Bank of India Vs Deepak Kumar Singhania (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
State Bank of India Vs Deepak Kumar Singhania (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT Delhi held that issuance of notice under rule 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 doesn’t amount to invoking of guarantee. Facts- The Corporate Debtor – LML Ltd. was extended Financial Facilities by State Bank of India. The Respondent – Deepak Kumar Singhania executed a Deed of Guarantee dated 28.03.2005 along with other two Personal Guarantors in favour of SBI and a Multi-Partite Agreement date...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930