Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balguri Rajeshwar Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balguri Rajeshwar Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Reassessment Quashed for Breach of Faceless Regime — JAO-Issued Notices Invalid The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT quashed the reassessment for AY 2016-17 holding that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) had issued the show-cause notice under section 148A(b), passed the order under section 148A(d), and issued the section 148 notice himself, without following the mandatory faceless procedure prescribed under sections 144B and 151A read with CBDT’s notifications. Relying on binding jurisdictional precedent—especially Kankanala Ravindra Redd...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930