Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Radhika Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Radhika Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Agra) Reassessment Void—Return Filed to 148 but No 143(2) Issued; AO Took Cognizance of Return Yet Skipped Mandatory Notice The Assessee appealed against the Addl./JCIT(A)-5, Mumbai’s order dated 24.06.2024 confirming reassessment u/s 144 r.w.s.147 dated 29.11.2019. There was a 68-day delay, which Tribunal condoned in the interest of justice. AO had reopened assessment based on information of ₹12,32,000 cash deposit in SBI account. Notice u/s 148 was issued on 31.03.2019. The Assessee filed her return on 22.11.2019. Thereafter, AO issued only 142(1) notices and...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930