DCIT Vs. Shri Jayesh Chandulal Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad)- Parties appearing before us have fairly expressed that since the issue pertaining to the quantum addition had already been restored back to the file of the Assessing Officer with certain directions for de novo adjudication, therefore consequence thereupon these penalty proceeding deserves to be restored back to the file of the Assessing Officer. Considering the totality of the facts of the case, we deem fit to restore the issue of levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the I.T.Act for afresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer in the light of the outcome of the assessment proceedings.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“ A ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
BEFORE SHRI MUKUL Kr.SHRAWAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI B.P.JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
|
Sl.Nos
|
IT(SS)A Nos/ CO Nos. |
Asst.Year(s) |
Appeals/COs by Appellant vs. Respondent |
|
| Appellant Respondent | ||||
| 1. | 115/Ahd/2010 | 1999- 2000 | DCIT,Mehsana
Circle,Mehsana |
Shri Jayesh Chandulal
Patel C/o.Vimal Electric Co. 31, GIDC Estate Highway, Mehsana PAN:ABXPP2978G |
| 2 | 116/Ahd/2010 | 2000-01 | Revenue | Assessee |
| 3. | 117/Ahd/2010 | 2001-02 | Revenue | Assessee |
| 4. | 118/Ahd/2010 | 2002-03 | Revenue | Assessee |
| 5. | 119/Ahd/2010 | 2003-04 | Revenue | Assessee |
| 6. | 120/Ahd/2010 | 2004-05 | Revenue | Assessee |
| 7. | CO81/Ahd/2010
(in IT(SS)A No.115/A/10) |
1999-2000 | Assessee | Revenue |
| 8. | CO82/Ahd/2010
(in IT(SS)A No.116/A/10) |
2000-01 | Assessee | Revenue |
| 9. | CO83/Ahd/2010
(in IT(SS)A No.117/A/10) |
2001-02 | Assessee | Revenue |
| 10. | CO84/Ahd/2010
Paid content
Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.
Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects. | |||





