CA. M. Lakshmanan

Under section 44AD from if the Turnover of an assessee being resident individual, HUF, Partnership Firm (not being a LLP) and who is not claiming deduction under section 10A, 10AA, 10B &10BA or deduction under Chapter VI A under the heading ‘C -Deductions in respect of certain Incomes’ and derives income from any business except business in respect of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages referred to in section 44AE is less than Rs. 2 Crores, then 8% of the turnover shall be deemed to be the income from Business, unless he declares more than that and any deduction allowable under sections from 30 to 38 shall deemed to have been allowed. Up to Asst Year 2016-17 in the case of Firms interest and salary were specifically allowed as deduction subject to limits specified under section 40(b). Once the Assessee has offered income under this scheme and if in any subsequent year if lower income is offered he shall not be eligible to claim the benefit of this section for next five years. The rationale behind this provision is not understood. The provisions of this section are not applicable to Professionals, and persons earning income from Agency Business/Commission & Brokerage. Now in the Budget it has been proposed that business income will be calculated @6% in respect of Turnover of gross receipt which is received by an account payee cheque/draft/use of electronic clearing system on or before the due date of filing the return of income. In respect of Sundry Debtors the amounts received in modes other than cash may be out of sales made in previous years and identifying the amounts received in such form for sales made in the current year and that too for such receipts received till the due date of filing the return of income is a herculean task unless separate records are kept. Though they need not keep ‘Books of Account’ some record should be maintained to confirm that the turnover is less than Rs. 2 Crore and to show out of the said Rs. 2 Crores how much is received in cash and how much is received in other modes. To avoid disputes the Income Tax Act/Rules may prescribe records and supporting documents to be maintained so that at the time of scrutiny or otherwise it will be easy for verification.

Likewise under section 44ADA for assessees engaged in profession referred to in subsection (1) of section 44AA such as legal, Medical, Accountancy, Technical Consultancy. Interior Decoration etc., if their gross receipts are less than Rs. 50 Lakhs,  then 50% of the turnover shall be deemed to be the income from Business, unless they declare more than that and any deduction allowable under sections from 30 to 38 shall deemed to have been allowed. It has been specifically stated that no further deductions under those sections shall be allowed.  Right from the inception in the case of Firms no deduction was specifically allowed as it was allowed u.s. 44AD.

Similarly under section 44AE for Assessees engaged in business of plying, leasing or hiring of trucks owning not more than 10 trucks at any time during the previous year,  income will be estimated @ Rs. 7,500/- p.m. per truck unless they declare more than that and any deduction allowable under sections from 30 to 38 shall deemed to have been allowed. In the case of Firms, interest and salary were specifically allowed as deduction subject to limits specified under section 40(b). Further the concession extended u.s 44AD with regard to receipts in modes other than cash is not proposed.

Though under all these sections if lower income is offered they have to maintain the prescribed books of account and get them audited under section 44AB, under section 44AD alone the return can be filed even without audit report also and such returns will be subjected to scrutiny under section 143(3).

Fortunately the restriction stipulated under section 44AD relating to denial of benefit of presumptive taxation for five years once the assessees offer less income after offering income under this scheme is not found in sections 44ADA & 44 AE.

While, in the case of Firms, the salary and interest, which were specifically allowed for assesses offering income under section 44AE, the specific proviso is missing in sections 44AD and 44ADA. In my opinion since it has been provided in section 44AD and 44ADA that only ‘deduction allowable under sections from 30 to 38 shall deemed to have been allowed and no further deduction under those sections shall be allowed, the Assessees, which are Firms, offering income under sections 44AD and 44ADA can claim the salary and interest paid to Partners also about which there is no mention in sections 30 to 38 and the allowable limits are specified in section 40(b) only. Moreover it is also reasonable to allow the deduction of interest and salary to Partners since the same will be subjected to tax in their hands along with other incomes earned by them.

Likewise the concession in the rate of calculation of income offered for digital transactions under section 44AD may be extended to the Assessees who are offering income under section 44ADA and 44AE also.

The rate of 50% of gross receipts to be offered as income is very high for professionals. Few Professionals who give opinion/advise/consultation only may be able to retain 50% of their gross receipts as profit. But other regular professionals, who are in majority, have to maintain regular office supported by trained staff with computer, vehicle etc., wherein they will not be able to retain 50% of their earnings as profit. This may be brought to at least 25%.

Read Other Articles of CA M. Lakshmanan

Author Bio

More Under Income Tax

Posted Under

Category : Income Tax (26738)
Type : Articles (16223) Featured (4128)

10 responses to “Practical issues in Presumptive Taxation – 44AD, 44ADA & 44AE”

  1. Tivari says:

    Mr.A is getting monthly income of Rs.50000 by giving his own vehicle (Lorry) to a transporter for rent on monthly basis. Out of 50000 there is no any other expenses included like Maintenance,salary,etc,, Can he file return U/s 44AE presumptive basis?

  2. sibasankar sahu says:

    sir please solve my query
    A B.com student who is not a professional got contractual post as accountant, not in a regular payroll of organisation how tds is deducted on his payment i.194c or 194j i am confused .further is it make difference. if he is a professional (ca/cma/cs)2. he is a not a accountant but a peon or a sweeper hired contractualy

  3. Debasis Dey says:

    If I calculate Profit u/s 44AD and I have Capital Gain Tax then I have to fill ITR4 instead of ITR4S.
    Kindly help how to fill ITR4.

  4. Leela Pillai says:

    Sir,

    Thanks. Last year I filed ITR4S Return but with 100% retainership fee as income less my conveyance charges as deduction. Can you please guide me as to which IT Form I have to file, is it ITR4 (it is almost a troublesome with 25 pages)?

  5. Ashok Jain says:

    Kinldy clarify:-
    In case of a doctor who is doing a) consultancy and b) giving injections for which he is charging cost plus his profit around 10%. As per rule he has to pay 50% of gross receipts. In nutshell he would be the looser in case of giving injection in which his profit is only 10% but he has to pay 50% on the gross receipts. Pl. advice under which section he is entitled to show both the receipts.

  6. Leela Pillai says:

    Sir,

    After retirement, I am working with the same company on a retainership basis. Though my annual income is less than Rs. 5 lakhs, can I file my return on presumptive taxation basis. If yes, what are the deductions I can offer.

    • kishor says:

      yes u can file return u/s provisions of 44ADA as on presumptive taxation basis. 50 % of your retainer ship gross receipt will be considered as income. No business related expense can be claimed as a deduction. However general deductions as available to individual taxpayers under various sub-sections of section 80 & 87A like PPF/LIC, medical insurance premiums etc will be available from that presumptive 50% income. You will need to file the return in form ITR 4S for this.

    • CA. M. Lakshmanan says:

      Reply to Ms. Leela Pillai
      No; this section applies to Income from Business only.

  7. DIVYESH PAREKH says:

    does warehousing income/ renting of immovable property income can be shown under presumtive tax scheme u/s 44AD

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *