Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balasaheb Bhagwat Horane Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balasaheb Bhagwat Horane Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) From ‘One-Day Notice’ to ‘Second Chance’ – Penalty rushed in a day, justice restored in a paragraph– ITAT Pune remands 271(1)(b) case Assessee, an individual from Pandharpur, was levied penalty of ₹30,000 u/s 271(1)(b) for alleged non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) dated 29.09.2020, 01.02.2021 & 22.02.2021 during assessment. AO held that Assessee failed to respond to these notices & accordingly imposed penalty. On appeal, the case took an interesting procedural turn. The appeal before NFAC (CIT(A)) was filed electronically i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930