Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty Passed Beyond Time Limit under Section 275(1)(c) Held Invalid

Case Law Details

Case Name
Narendrakumar Lalchand Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement
Narendrakumar Lalchand Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) quashed as time barred- Order passed beyond limitation u/s 275(1)(c): ITAT Mumbai Mumbai ITAT struck down a penalty of ₹10,000 levied u/s 271(1)(b) for alleged non-compliance with a statutory notice, holding that the order was passed well beyond the limitation period prescribed u/s 275(1)(c). Assessee’s assessment for AY 2012-13 was completed u/s 144 r.w.s. 143(3) on 17.12.2019, wherein an addition of ₹2,37,700 was made u/s 68. AO, on 18.12.2019, initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(b) for failure to comply with a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *