Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Narendrakumar Lalchand Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Narendrakumar Lalchand Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) quashed as time barred- Order passed beyond limitation u/s 275(1)(c): ITAT Mumbai Mumbai ITAT struck down a penalty of ₹10,000 levied u/s 271(1)(b) for alleged non-compliance with a statutory notice, holding that the order was passed well beyond the limitation period prescribed u/s 275(1)(c). Assessee’s assessment for AY 2012-13 was completed u/s 144 r.w.s. 143(3) on 17.12.2019, wherein an addition of ₹2,37,700 was made u/s 68. AO, on 18.12.2019, initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(b) for failure to comply with a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930