Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name :  Akshay Bhan Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
 Akshay Bhan Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Mere non-disclosure of Foreign Asset in the Income tax return, by itself, does not lead to Penalty u/s 43 Assessee is an individual who made investments through legitimate sources through banking channels under Liberalized Remittances Scheme for resident individuals in a foreign company in FY 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2015-16. AO imposed a penalty of Rs. 10 Lakhs u/s 43 of the Black Money Act for the AYs 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 on the grounds that these investments were not disclosed in schedule FA of the ROI which was also confirmed by the CIT. Asse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930