Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty Deleted After Quantum Remand for Lack of Proper Hearing

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 208
Case Name
Rohan Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2007-08
Advertisement


Rohan Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

No Hearing, No Penalty: ITAT Revives Accommodation Entry Case- Rule 46A Ignored, Justice Restored: Quantum Sent Back

In Rohan Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, ITA No.968/Del/2017 (quantum) & ITA No.4849/Del/2019 (penalty), AY 2007-08, order dated 31.12.2025, Delhi ITAT set aside quantum addition & deleted consequential penalty u/s 271(1)(c).

Assessee’s return declaring NIL income was processed u/s 143(1). Based on Investigation Wing information alleging accommodation entries, assessment was reopened u/s 147 & completed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144, making addition of ₹19.28 lakh. CIT(A) dismissed appeal & also rejected admission of additional evidence u/r 46A without adequate reasoning.

Tribunal held that denial of opportunity & mechanical rejection of additional evidence could result in miscarriage of justice. In interest of fairness, ITAT remitted quantum issue back to CIT(A) with direction to admit & examine additional evidence after granting reasonable opportunity to Assessee, with liberty to proceed ex-parte in case of non-cooperation. Since quantum matter was restored, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) could not survive & was deleted. Quantum appeal was allowed for statistical purposes & penalty appeal was allowed.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI

The captioned appeals, preferred by the assessee, are directed against separate orders passed by the passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, New Delhi dated 09.01.2017 [Appeal No. 640/CIT(A)-7/Del/14-15] and dated 06.05.2019 [Appeal No. 10040/40/CIT(A)-7/Del/18-19)], in proceedings under Section 147/144 and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), respectively, for the Assessment Year 2007-08. Both the appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by a common order for the sake of convenience.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,232

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.