Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Holding Company Is in Business Even Without Operating Revenue

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 245
Case Name
Lifestyle And Media Holding Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2014-15
Advertisement

Lifestyle And Media Holding Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Holding Company Activity Is Business: Delhi ITAT Allows Expenses & Set-off Despite No Operating Revenue

No Revenue, Yet Business Exists- Holding Is Doing Business: ITAT Allows Expenses Even Without Operating Income;

Strategic Investments Pass Section 2(13) Test-  Artificial Person Still Needs Staff: Holding Co’s Expenses Held Allowable

Set-up Is Enough: ITAT Rejects “No Business Activity” Theory for Holding Companies

Delhi ITAT ‘E’ Bench in Lifestyle and Media Holding Ltd. (formerly NDTV Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.) Vs. DCIT [ITA No. 64/Del/2019 (AY 2014-15), ITA No. 3714/Del/2024 (AY 2015-16) & ITA No. 255/Del/2020 (AY 2016-17), order dated 31.12.2025] allowed Assessee’s appeals holding that activity of a holding company in making strategic investments in subsidiaries constitutes “business” u/s 2(13). AO had disallowed business expenses on ground that Assessee had not carried out any business activity and had no income under head “Profits & gains of business or profession”, and consequently denied set-off of business loss against income from other sources. Tribunal noted that Assessee’s main object was to act as holding company for non-news lifestyle media ventures and it had in fact made substantial investments in group companies to exercise controlling interest. Relying on coordinate bench decisions in Tata Sons Ltd. and NDTV Networks Ltd., Tribunal held that earning of income is not prerequisite for allowability of business expenditure and that holding investments for strategic control itself is business activity. Accordingly, business expenses were allowable u/s 37(1) and current year business loss was eligible for set-off u/s 71 against income from other heads. Tribunal allowed all three assessment years consistently and set aside contrary findings of CIT(A).

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,923

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.