Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Singh Hukam Singh Karnawat Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santosh Singh Hukam Singh Karnawat Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) Penalty on Estimated Bogus Purchases Deleted – ITAT Surat Follows Consistent Jurisprudence- When Purchases Are Bogus But Profit Is Estimated — Penalty Fails in Law Assessee, engaged in diamond trading, was alleged to have made bogus purchases of ₹1,11,61,150 from Euro Diam & Little Diam following search findings in the Bhanwarlal Jain accommodation-entry group. AO rejected Assessee’s evidences & treated the entire purchases as bogus, levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment. CIT(A) upheld the penalty but restricte...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 50C & Section 54F Issues; CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930