Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Extensive Trading Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Extensive Trading Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) No Exempt Income, No 14A, No Penalty -When Quantum Addition Falls, 270A Penalty Cannot Survive—ITAT Delhi Quashes Penalty Tribunal considered penalty of ₹19,51,100 levied by AO u/s 270A. The penalty was based on disallowance u/s 14A. Assessee submitted that Tribunal, in its quantum appeal ITA 625/Del/2025 dated 14.05.2025, had already deleted the 14A disallowance by holding that the Finance Act 2022 amendment inserting a non-obstante clause & explanation in s.14A applies prospectively from 01.04.2022, & no disallowance can be made where...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930