Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kashinath Tapuriah Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. Nos. 2919 to 2924/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/04/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2001 to 2001 to 2006- 2007
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

From a bare reading of section 139 and 153A, it is evident that the provisions of section 271F are attracted when a person is required to furnish the return in accordance with section 139(1) or by provisos of that section. Section 153A starts with non-obstante clause and the purpose is only to specify separate time limit for filing the return.

The only distinction in section 153A is that the AO is required to issue notice to the assessee requiring him to furnish the return within such period, as may be specified in notice, but

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31