This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Passing of rectification order u/s. 154 without opportunity of being heard is bad-in-law
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Brig. (Retd.) Jitendra Kumar Narang Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2007-08
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Brig. (Retd.) Jitendra Kumar Narang Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
ITAT Pune held that rectification order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act passed without providing an opportunity of being heard is bad-in-law and deserved to be set aside. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
Facts- AO on the basis of annual information return i.e. AIR found that the assessee has invested Rs.2,40,000/- in Sundaram BNP Paribas on 02.04.2006 and Rs.4 lakh in SBI mutual fund on 11.04.2006 which amounts in all to Rs.6,40,000/-. According to AO, the salary income of the assessee was only Rs.5,36,802/...





