Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhanesh Badarmal Jain Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dhanesh Badarmal Jain Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee filed return for AY 2021-22 declaring income of ₹4.99 lakh. In scrutiny, AO noticed unsecured loans of ₹1.36 crore, out of which ₹92 lakh was fresh loans from 10 parties & the balance ₹44.51 lakh was interest accrued thereon. As assessee failed to prove identity & creditworthiness of creditors, AO added ₹92 lakh u/s 68 as unexplained loans, besides addition of ₹14 lakh unexplained cash deposit, & completed assessment at ₹1.10 crore. PCIT later invoked revision u/s 263, observing that AO erred in not disallowing t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930