Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Naozer Bejon Baldawala (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Naozer Bejon Baldawala (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT Deletes Entire Bogus Purchase Addition: General Hawala Statements Cannot Override Site-Level Evidence The Mumbai ITAT upheld the deletion of an addition of ₹1.07 crore made on account of alleged bogus purchases, holding that generalized statements of alleged hawala dealers cannot outweigh direct documentary evidence establishing actual purchase, delivery, and consumption of materials. The assessee, engaged in property development, renovation and repair contracts, had been subjected to reassessment based on information from the Maharash...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Chennai ITAT Deletes Section 271D Penalty on Cash Property Sale Consideration Chennai ITAT: 80G Approval Cannot Be Denied Without Verifying Religious Expenditure Chennai ITAT Deletes ₹7 Lakh Addition; Cash Gift from Son Proven by Cash Flow Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty for Bona Fide Interchange of Partner’s Remuneration & Profit Share Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Genuine Intraday Penny Stock Trade View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031