Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Raghav Bahl (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Raghav Bahl (ITAT Delhi) Additional Evidence Allowed, Salary Refund Accepted & Foreign Property Source Explained: Delhi ITAT Dismisses Revenue Appeals Delhi ITAT, Delhi Bench ‘A’, in DCIT Vs Raghav Bahl (ITA Nos.1639 & 1640/Del/2023; AYs 2012-13 & 2020-21; order dated 19-12-2025), dismissed both Revenue appeals, affirming the detailed relief granted by the Ld. CIT(A). For AY 2012-13, the Tribunal upheld admission of additional evidence u/r 46A to establish cost & period of acquisition of shares sold during the year. The CIT(A) had meticulously examined tranche-wise ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930