Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Salil Sadanand Phadte Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Salil Sadanand Phadte Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai: Employer Advances Can’t Be Branded as Unexplained Money Without Proper Verification; Matter Sent Back for Limited Remand Assessee, an employee, received substantial amounts from employer M/s Sanda Wellbeing Pvt. Ltd., which were claimed as advances for customer acquisition & business promotion expenses. AO treated ₹1.20 crore as unexplained money u/s 69A, mainly due to absence of vouchers & cash withdrawals, & CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Tribunal noted that employer’s own letters & books treated the sums as “adv...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031