Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Salil Sadanand Phadte Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Salil Sadanand Phadte Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai: Employer Advances Can’t Be Branded as Unexplained Money Without Proper Verification; Matter Sent Back for Limited Remand

Assessee, an employee, received substantial amounts from employer M/s Sanda Wellbeing Pvt. Ltd., which were claimed as advances for customer acquisition & business promotion expenses. AO treated ₹1.20 crore as unexplained money u/s 69A, mainly due to absence of vouchers & cash withdrawals, & CIT(A) confirmed the additi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Additions Fail Without Corroboration and Cross-Examination Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031