Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Borze India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

ITO Vs Borze India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

Rule 46A can’t be bypassed even if evidences are official records or available in public domain : ITAT restores issue to CIT(A) on improper admission of additional evidence

Delhi ITAT allowed Revenue’s appeal for statistical purposes &  set aside the order of CIT(A) on the limited issue of admission of additional evidence. Tribunal noted that CIT(A) admitted substantial additional evidence, including VAT returns to justify cash sales, without recording satisfaction under Rule 46A &am

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Audit Penalty Set Aside Due to Bona Fide Cause for Delay Dividend Exemption Restored as Form Cannot Override Substance Section 68 Addition Set Aside for Non-Consideration of Evidence Service Tax Demand Fails Where No Event Management Activity Exists: SC 80G Approval Not Deniable for Incidental Religious Activities View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031