Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Brij Mohan Joshi Vs ITO (ITAT Indore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brij Mohan Joshi Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) CIT(A) Dismissal Faulted –Short Notice Period Violated Natural Justice – Case Sent Back for De Novo Consideration Assessee filed return of income at ₹2,58,865/-. AO completed assessment u/s 143(3) computing total income at ₹20,23,400/-. Additions included ₹3,91,000/- u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE being cash deposited in SBN (demonetised currency) & ₹13,73,533/- treating 8% of cash deposits of ₹2.09 crore (other than SBN) as business receipts. AO also invoked audit u/s 44AB & levied interest u/s 234B. CIT(A), vide order dated 28.02.2025, dismis...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930