Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil K. Shah (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Anil K. Shah (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, deleted a penalty of Rs. 6,96,096/- levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against Anil K. Shah (HUF) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10. While the Tribunal acknowledged that the underlying quantum appeal had confirmed that the purchase transactions were bogus, the penalty was struck down because the Assessing Officer (AO) had levied it on the charge of “concealing the part

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031