Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhupendrabhai Bhikhalal Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhupendrabhai Bhikhalal Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee sold agricultural land for ₹10,00,000. However, the Sub-Registrar adopted jantri value of ₹29,65,802 for stamp duty purposes.  AO reopened the assessment & applied u/s 50C, taking stamp duty value as full consideration &  computed STCG of ₹24,53,638. Further, ₹1,75,000 commission income was also added as income from other sources since Assessee did not report it in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148. Before CIT(A),  Assessee did not file any evidence or submissions. Hence, CIT(A) upheld the additions....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930