Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chameli Devi Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chameli Devi Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) On-money allegation based only on photocopy of agreement – ITAT partly deletes addition, sustains only advance paid in year Assessee’s case was reopened u/s 147 based on a photocopy of an unregistered agreement to sell dated 02.03.2012, alleging that she purchased a flat for ₹30,25,000, including ₹5,00,000 cash &  balance ₹25,25,000 within two months. However, the registered sale deed dated 06.07.2012 showed the sale price as ₹16,00,000, out of which ₹4,75,000 was paid in cash on 10.03.2012 &  the balance ₹11,25,000 was paid by cheque...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930