Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Surjeet Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Surjeet Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Agra) No Fresh Loans, No Fresh Nexus—57(iii) Deduction Restored—AO Cannot Re-examine Nexus Every Year Assessee, engaged in liquor business & partner in firms, declared interest income of Rs.1,17,97,996 & claimed interest expenditure of Rs.1,21,87,907, resulting in loss of Rs.8,89,911 under income from other sources. AO disallowed interest paid u/s 57(iii) on the ground that Assessee failed to prove one-to-one nexus between borrowed funds & loans advanced. NFAC upheld disallowance. Tribunal noted that no fresh borrowings or fresh advances were made du...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law ITAT Bangalore Quashes Sec 263 Revision: No Error in Valuation & No Need to Initiate Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930