Case Law Details
Balaji Super Alloys Vs PCIT (Madras High Court)
In the case of Balaji Super Alloys Vs. PCIT, the Madras High Court examined the issue of condoning a 21-second delay in filing the Income Tax Return (ITR) and its impact on the claim of deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The petitioner, Balaji Super Alloys, challenged the order passed by the Principal Commissioner, Coimbatore, which disallowed the deduction under Section 80IA due to a 21-second delay in filing the ITR for the assessment year 2020-2021. The court acknowledged that while the rejection of the deduction was justified, the delay was minimal and could be seen as a human error. The court deemed it appropriate to condone the delay and allowed the deduction claim.
The court emphasized the importance of timely compliance with statutory obligations, especially for companies like Balaji Super Alloys. However, it also noted that the software’s automated portal closure at midnight might have contributed to the delay. The court held that the decision to reject the condonation request should have been approached with a more lenient perspective.
Conclusion: In the case of Balaji Super Alloys Vs. PCIT, the Madras High Court’s judgment sets a precedent by condoning a minor delay in filing the ITR and upholding the claim for Section 80IA deduction. The ruling highlights the significance of adhering to filing deadlines and the need for businesses to exercise due diligence in statutory compliances. While the rejection of deductions for late filings is reasonable, the court’s decision underscores the consideration of human errors and substantial justice in such matters.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
Thanks for sharing