Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Debabrata-Auro Foundation Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : NA
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Debabrata-Auro Foundation Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Mumbai) Existing Trust Not Hit by 6-Month Rule — ITAT Revives 12AB & 80G Applications The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the rejection of the assessee-foundation’s applications for final registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G, holding that the CIT(E) had misapplied the limitation provisions under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii). The assessee, an existing Section-8 company registered under section 12A since 2017, had applied for provisional registration under the new regime in January 2023 a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930