This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Ensuring a fair hearing is a fundamental principle in tax adjudication: ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mohammed Amer Ul Haq Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Mohammed Amer Ul Haq Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore has set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and granted Mohammed Amer Ul Haq a fresh opportunity to present his case. The appeal, concerning the assessment year 2015-16, arose after the CIT(A) confirmed the Assessing Officer’s (AO) order due to the assessee’s failure to respond to multiple hearing notices. The assessee argued that the non-compliance was unintentional and resulted from non-receipt of email notices.
The assessee contended that the denial of a he...
