Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Giri Bahadur Vs Ward (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Giri Bahadur Vs Ward (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that amendment to section 36(1)(va) is not applicable to A.Y. 2017-2018. Accordingly, as the employees contribution to provident fund is deposited before the due date u/s. 139(1) of the Act, the same cannot be disallowed. Facts- Vide the present appeal, the appellant mainly contested that CIT(A) has erred in disallowing the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund (PF) and Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) being statutory obligation discharged by Appellant before filing of return of income. Conclusion- Held that the amendment wa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930