Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs National Peroxide Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs National Peroxide Limited (ITAT Mumbai) In the order u/s143(3), AO disallowed the deduction on account of embezzlement of funds amounting to Rs.18.96 crores &  the expenditure related to exempt income u/s14A  read with Rule 8D. Additionally, the return of income filed by Assessee was processed u/s143(1)(a). While computing the income, additions were made on account of disallowance of exempt income claimed u/s115-P amounting to Rs.17,06,252/- & disallowance u/s43B amounting to Rs.1,73,77,069/-. Both issues relating to the additions u/s 115-O & 43B were contested by Assesse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930