Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Raghav Kumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Raghav Kumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) These appeals arose from search-based assessments initiated u/s 153C against Assessee based on WhatsApp chats  &  photos of envelopes allegedly found in the mobile phone of a third party (Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain) during search on the Hans Group. AO presumed that Assessee had given cash loan of ₹22.50 Cr to Mahagun India Pvt. Ltd.  &  received assured interest @12%,  &  accordingly made additions u/s 69 (unexplained investment)  &  u/s 69A (cash interest). Assessee denied any such transaction, pointed out that his name did not even appe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930