Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjana Anil Agarwa Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-2015
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjana Anil Agarwa Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) KDJ Penny Stock Charge Fails — Mumbai ITAT Deletes ₹4.53 Cr Addition u/s 68 & 3% Commission The Mumbai ITAT (G Bench) allowed the appeal of the Assessee for AY 2014-15 and deleted the addition of ₹4.53 crore made u/s 68 of the Income-tax Act by treating long-term capital gains on sale of shares of KDJ Holidays Scapes & Resorts Ltd. as bogus, along with consequential addition of 3% commission u/s 69C. The Tribunal held that the Assessee had discharged the primary onus by producing complete documentary evidence, including preferential allotm...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930