This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Additions based on BUP IDs, internal identifiers and presumptive opening deposits are not sustainable
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Anil Dhirajlal Ambani (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2001-02
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Anil Dhirajlal Ambani (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that additions made on substantive and protective basis merely on the strength of BUP IDs, internal identifiers, and presumptive opening deposits are unsustainable. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
Facts- The assessee filed the return of income declaring a total income of Rs.7,11,89,070/-, which was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, reasons were recorded and notice u/s. 148 was issued. The assessment was thereafter completed u/s. 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act. AO, relying upon the report of the...
Author Info
