Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Savitrivasudeva Govinda Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Savitrivasudeva Govinda Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Past Withdrawals Valid Source- Demonetisation Deposits Explained – ITAT Deletes 69A Addition for Retired 82-Year LIC Officer Bangalore ITAT dealt with addition made on account of demonetisation cash deposits. Assessee, a retired LIC employee aged 82 years, had deposited ₹15.30 lakh in his savings account during November 2016. AO treated these deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A after accepting only part of his explanation, while CIT(A) upheld the addition on the assumption that withdrawals were made over several years since 2011, which ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930