Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri Ramakant Rajaram Bodke (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No.704/PUN/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/02/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Shri Ramakant Rajaram Bodke (ITAT Pune)

It is an admitted fact that the assessee in the original return of income or in the revised return of income had never claimed deduction u/s.54F of the Act. Further, it is the case of the assessee that benefit of deduction u/s.54F is with respect to capital gains arising in the hands of wife of assessee which was suo-moto clubbed in the hands of assessee u/s. 64 of the Act. One of the conditions for claiming deduction u/s. 54F is that claim should have been made in the return of income. Since no such clai

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31