Case Law Details
Case Name : The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri Ramakant Rajaram Bodke (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Shri Ramakant Rajaram Bodke (ITAT Pune)
It is an admitted fact that the assessee in the original return of income or in the revised return of income had never claimed deduction u/s.54F of the Act. Further, it is the case of the assessee that benefit of deduction u/s.54F is with respect to capital gains arising in the hands of wife of assessee which was suo-moto clubbed in the hands of assessee u/s. 64 of the Act. One of the conditions for claiming deduction u/s. 54F is that claim should have been made in the return of income. Since no such claim was made by assessee in the return of i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

