Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Alok Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Alok Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore: CIT(A) cannot travel beyond Reopening Reasons – Additions on Share Trading Deposits Quashed Assessee, a UK-based professional, had not filed returns for AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13. Based on information from the Investigation Wing,  AO reopened assessments u/s 147/148 alleging Cash deposits in bank accounts &   Large investments in mutual funds. As Assessee did not respond to statutory notices,  AO completed the reassessment u/s 144 r.w.s. 147, treating ₹2.08 lakh as unexplained cash deposits&   ₹1.41 crore (AY 2011-12) &...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930