Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹37 Lakh 271D Penalty: Third-Party Statements Insufficient

Case Law Details

Case Name
Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2010-11
Advertisement
Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹37 Lakh Penalty u/s 271D: Third-Party Statements Alone Not Enough The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2010-11 and deleted the penalty of ₹37,00,000 levied under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS, holding that the penalty was imposed solely on the basis of third-party statements without any corroborative evidence. The assessee, Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia, was subjected to penalty proceedings after the Assessing Officer alleged acceptance of cash loans of ₹37 lakh, based on sta...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,493

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *