Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹37 Lakh Penalty u/s 271D: Third-Party Statements Alone Not Enough The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2010-11 and deleted the penalty of ₹37,00,000 levied under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS, holding that the penalty was imposed solely on the basis of third-party statements without any corroborative evidence. The assessee, Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia, was subjected to penalty proceedings after the Assessing Officer alleged acceptance of cash loans of ₹37 lakh, based on sta...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930