Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Upma Shukla Proprietor Troubleshooters Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Upma Shukla Proprietor Troubleshooters Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) This appeal by the assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals) challenging the additions on account of long term capital gains arising from transfer of land and also an addition on account of short term capital gains arising from transfer of building. The AO observed that the assessee sold land and claimed to have received only Rs. 2,50,000/- as consideration. However, as per registered deed the value adopted for the purpose of payment of stamp duty by the State Government, in respect of the said transfer was Rs. 1...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. narayanan says:

    asessee received notice u/sec.148 to file Retun for the information received asseessee sold property, not disclosed. Assessee said he sold a property as GPA and he did possess a property to sell on his own.
    ITO passed order u sec 144 treating the sale value as his capital gain.

    is GPA CAN BE HELD Liable to capital gain when did not own and sell but sold a property of someone as a GPA.

    please clarify under the income tax act, power agent is liable to pay means how will he pay the tax when he did not have any income.

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment to narayanan

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930